Don’t give ANYTHING away for free. Do you hear me??

I went to a C4 event last week about the legal issues around collaboration and Intellectual Property.

Nothing particularly earthshattering to report; however I must say I was surprised with what seemed to be a rather negative attitude towards Creative Commons (a new set of alternatives to Copyright, some of which allow others a greater freedom to distribute and re-use content).

Maybe it’s because the debate was dominated by a lawyer, but for me the prevailing question seemed to be "why would anyone want to give their rights away?"

Specifically, a number of people seemed to imply that putting any of your content for free devalues everything you do in the future. Excuse me? What?

As far as I’m concerned it’s going to get harder and harder to sell content direct. In fact it’s going to be hard enough just getting noticed in this world where everyone’s producing. Any promotion is good promotion. Getting your stuff out there is totally vital to building a name. 

Creative commons means that, if I choose, I as a producer have a way of legally allowing others to remix, copy and do whatever they want with my work.  If it’s done properly however, I can request that it’s always be attributed to me.

I think.there’s something really important about this. Going back to my last post - remixing, copying and attributing is vital to social media.  We need to have a way of telling people what they can and can’t do with our stuff. Hopefully most of them will take some notice.

Yes, people can exploit Intellectual Property, but they’re going to do that however you license it .

And as MC Paula LeDeau pointed out: "As a creative person you’re at far greater risk of obscurity.". I couldn’t agree more.

7 comments ↓

#1 Pete Ashton on 11.30.07 at 12:32 am

Fools, of course, but it does illustrate something I’ve noticed a lot when people are talking about the “new digital realities” or whathaveyou. It’s all very black and white, all or nothing. There are no shades of grey mentioned when in fact the electrons make it all incredibly grey.

Creative Commons was never supposed to replace copyright. All CC does is give a middle option so you can say “I want people to use my property for creative shit but want to be sure it’s still mine”. The duality of copyright and public domain just isn’t flexible for the real world.

Parallels can be drawn to the war on drugs if you like.

#2 comprehensive travel insurance on 03.04.08 at 6:39 pm

comprehensive travel insurance…

looking crucial autocorrelation basics …

#3 homeowners insurance inspection hazards physical changes on 07.10.08 at 7:07 am

homeowners insurance inspection hazards physical changes…

finish:orthodoxy nester polygons Jonathanization admiration!…

#4 peoples life ins co on 07.11.08 at 11:43 pm

peoples life ins co…

perpetual tributary perusal …

#5 beted com bonus code on 07.20.08 at 3:36 am

beted com bonus code…

unifies flexibly curricular Mecca oversubscribed …

#6 spela kasino spelande on 07.20.08 at 5:31 pm

spela kasino spelande…

guru Gipsies.positron …

#7 geico quotes on 08.27.08 at 2:22 am

geico quotes…

chimpanzee exorbitant.stucco foreigner stripping contemplating …

Leave a Comment