<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sugary Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antoniogould.com/2009/11/26/sugary-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antoniogould.com/2009/11/26/sugary-media/</link>
	<description>Executive Producer: Digital / Multiplatform</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 08:59:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antonio Gould</title>
		<link>http://antoniogould.com/2009/11/26/sugary-media/comment-page-1/#comment-94030</link>
		<dc:creator>Antonio Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniogould.com/?p=598#comment-94030</guid>
		<description>Hi Si,

Glad you enjoyed it! Really recommend checking out more of Danah&#039;s work - she&#039;s really good on this stuff.

A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Si,</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed it! Really recommend checking out more of Danah&#8217;s work &#8211; she&#8217;s really good on this stuff.</p>
<p>A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si Hammond</title>
		<link>http://antoniogould.com/2009/11/26/sugary-media/comment-page-1/#comment-93994</link>
		<dc:creator>Si Hammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 12:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antoniogould.com/?p=598#comment-93994</guid>
		<description>Fascinating talk that rang a lot of bells for me - thanks!

Infobesity is a known problem but the parasocial side of social media is a new phenomena.  How far does Facebook/Twitter personalise celebrities and how far does it encourage people to frame themselves as micro-celebrity brands?

Likewise, the option of homophiliy has never been so available but flocks make me fundamentally uneasy.  I always jump at the chance to debate a christian or tory.

Naysaying aside, the possibilities of models that naturally support attention flow with contextualised, pertinant and novel content are hugely exciting.  My guess is that when this works well, adverts will actually be welcome commercial content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating talk that rang a lot of bells for me &#8211; thanks!</p>
<p>Infobesity is a known problem but the parasocial side of social media is a new phenomena.  How far does Facebook/Twitter personalise celebrities and how far does it encourage people to frame themselves as micro-celebrity brands?</p>
<p>Likewise, the option of homophiliy has never been so available but flocks make me fundamentally uneasy.  I always jump at the chance to debate a christian or tory.</p>
<p>Naysaying aside, the possibilities of models that naturally support attention flow with contextualised, pertinant and novel content are hugely exciting.  My guess is that when this works well, adverts will actually be welcome commercial content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

